Critique without merit

 

In his Oct. 8 Soapbox, William Rutledge presents a remarkably fact-free critique of an earlier Soapbox by Cheryl Distaso encouraging students to "opt out" of military recruitment in our public schools. Distaso made the point that military recruiters are frequently untruthful when attempting to sign people up to take part in the occupation of Iraq, which is itself based on a history of deception.

Rutledge challenges Distaso's statement that a woman runs a significantly greater risk of being raped in the military than she would in civilian life by saying that he participated in many courts martial while in the Air Force and "understand(s) the fairness of the system." He dismisses the local organization "Youth Against Militarism" by saying that he "cannot believe that this organization was established or sustained by 'youths.'" Such empty statements flirt with solipsism, i.e. the belief that self is the only reality.

Rutledge writes that it is apparent that Distaso "is not a military veteran." He thereby implies that she has no basis for criticizing military recruitment efforts. Nevermind that Distaso's taxes support the military or that she provides facts suggesting that military recruiters often mislead potential recruits.

Indeed, the attitude that all things military are beyond criticism is a hallmark of the ideology of militarism. That ideology and the fiscal priorities it supports are bankrupting our society, both materially and morally. We need to hold those who deceive us on behalf of militarism accountable, be they the local recruiting sergeant or the commander-in-chief.

Kevin Cross,
Fort Collins

 

originally published in the Fort Collins Coloradoan